If there is no backdoor and your encrypted data must be brute-forced then there is time for your contact to evade detection and escape. You are held and your equipment is examined. Imagine that you're a journalist with interviews & other incriminating data from a whistleblower. One example of where a backdoored system is immediately worse than than a non-backdoored one is this: and if you are on windows why are you worried about truecrypt you have bigger security problems Until such time I will avoid truecrypt Until Phase II is complete.Īnd unless you are on windows there are better options anyway today. So it is not I, nor /u/mangeek that needs to provide a vulnerability, no it is you that needs to prove that it is in fact secure. I am unaware of any complete audits that have been done on TrueCrypt. So since there is a question about the security of truecrypt, the prudent course of action is to assume that is compromised until it is proven not to be by an audit or other methods.
Truecrypt alternative for windows 8 professional#
I have no proof that truecypt is compromised, but here is the thing, real security professional assume everything is compromised until someone shows, explains, or proves it is not. I see you take the fools approach to cryptography. If you have evidence to the contrary, the Internet would love to see it.
0 kommentar(er)
